Preview Post
- March 24, 2026
There is a shift happening in the Shopify ecosystem that feels similar to what we are seeing with LLMs and search. It is not obvious at first, but once you spot it, it changes how you look at the entire app layer.
I realised this properly the other week when I vibe coded a bulk import and export tool similar to Matrixify using Claude Code. It did not take long. It was not perfect, but it worked. More importantly, it worked well enough to make a point.
The barrier to building useful software has dropped to a level that feels uncomfortable for parts of the current app marketplace.
What I mean by vibe coding is simple. You describe what you want, guide the logic, correct it when it drifts, and iterate until the output does the job. You are not engineering from first principles. You are shaping something into existence. In practical terms, it gives a non-technical founder something close to junior developer capability almost instantly.
That alone would not matter if the problems being solved in the Shopify app store were deeply complex. The reality is that many of them are not. A large portion of the ecosystem is built around relatively simple ideas. Importing and exporting data, editing fields in bulk, adding lightweight functionality that sits on top of APIs. Useful, yes. Technically complex, not always.
The reason these tools exist as paid products is not because they are difficult to build. It is because they are reliable, supported and already packaged. That has always been enough to justify a monthly fee.
The question now is what happens when the cost of building something “good enough” approaches near zero.
There is a category of Shopify apps that are low complexity but high convenience. These are the tools that solve straightforward problems and charge a recurring fee because the alternative has historically been time, effort or technical friction. This is the layer that looks most exposed.
Typical examples include:
If a merchant or agency can recreate most of that functionality in a short space of time, the willingness to keep paying for it starts to erode. It does not disappear overnight, but it becomes harder to justify.
At the same time, there is another category of apps that sits at the opposite end of the spectrum. These are the tools that deal with scale, edge cases and operational risk. They are not just features, they are systems.
These typically include:
These tools have spent years dealing with the oddities of the Shopify APIs, rate limits and data structures. They are supported, tested and trusted. That kind of value does not get replaced by quickly generated code. If anything, it becomes more obvious why it exists.
Image above: Shopify App Store
This creates a clear divide. Simple, replaceable tools become increasingly commoditised. More people can build them, more alternatives appear and pricing pressure increases.
More complex, deeply integrated tools move in the opposite direction. Their value strengthens because they are harder to replicate properly.
It is one thing to vibe code a working tool. It is another to run something reliably at scale without introducing risk.
There is also a wider context here around how Shopify is evolving. Shopify has always kept its core product relatively lean and pushed more advanced functionality into the app ecosystem.
That is still true, but the cost of building on top of it is falling.
You can now:
That changes the threshold at which a third-party tool needs to justify its cost.
There is one part of this that is easy to gloss over when people talk about vibe coding replacing apps.
Shopify apps are not plugins that run inside the platform. They are externally hosted services. If you build your own, you are responsible for running it. That comes with a cost, even if it is relatively small.
At a minimum, you are dealing with:
None of this is particularly difficult if you are comfortable running servers, but it is not zero effort and it is not free forever. This is also where a lot of the value in paid apps comes from. You are not just paying for the feature. You are paying for something that is already running, monitored and supported.
So while vibe coding lowers the barrier to building tools, it does not remove the responsibility of operating them. It shifts the decision from “can this be built” to “is it worth me running this myself”.
Vibe coding does not remove the need for good software. It raises the bar for what good actually means. If something is simple, replaceable and easy to rebuild, it will struggle to hold value over time.
If it is robust, reliable and solves problems that carry real operational risk, it becomes more valuable, not less.
That is the shift that is starting to happen.
Comments:
Comments are closed.